System and Method for Media Segment Identification

ABSTRACT

A system and method for identifying media segments using audio augmented image cross-comparison is disclosed, in which a media segment identifying system analyses both audio and video content, producing a unique identifier to compare with previously identified media segments in a media segment database. The characteristic landmark-linked-image-comparisons are constructed by first identifying pairs of audio landmarks separated by a characteristic, or landmark, time. Digital images associated the audio landmarks are then compared, with the combination providing a characteristic landmark-linked-image-comparison. The audio landmarks are audio peaks that exceed predetermined thresholds. A landmark-time is the time between adjacent pairs of audio peaks. The pair of images associated with the audio peaks are reduced in pixel size and converted to gray scale. Corresponding pixels are compared to form a numeric comparison. One image may be mirrored before comparison to reduce the possibility of null comparisons.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent applicationSer. No. 16/110,265 filed on Aug. 23, 2018 entitled “System and Methodfor Media Segment Identification”, that in turn claims priority to U.S.patent application Ser. No. 15/852,389 filed on Dec. 22, 2017 entitled“System for the Augmented Assessment of Virtual InsertionOpportunities”, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,096,169 issued on Oct. 9, 2018, andto U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/608,666 filed on Dec. 21,2017 entitled “Augmented Virtual Video-Insertion”, the contents of allof which are hereby fully incorporated herein by reference.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION (1) Field of the Invention

The invention relates to a system and method for automaticallyidentifying media segments, and more particularly to using an audioenhanced image comparison to compare media segments to a database ofpreviously identified media segments.

(2) Description of the Related Art

The technical problem of automatically identifying media segments isinherent in the technical fields of media distribution and monitoring,and may be used for purposes such as, but not limited to, scheduling,billing, and rights protection.

Attempting to match images using pixel by pixel comparison can becomputationally expensive, especially if the image is being sought in areal-time broadcast, or streaming, of high definition television images.In the case where the objective may be to find an occurrence of aparticular reference image, or images, in a broadcast stream, errors ofomission may, for instance, occur if the broadcast stream has beenaltered, either by resizing, or by color filtering.

What is needed is a system and method that can reliably, robustly, andcomputationally efficiently, identify video image segments in a realtime digital media content stream.

The relevant prior art includes: U.S. Pat. No. 7,881,657 issued to Wang,et al. on Feb. 1, 2011 entitled “Method for high-throughputidentification of distributed broadcast content” that describes a methodand system of performing high-throughput identifications of broadcastcontent. A device is disclosed that can send a content identificationquery, which includes a sample of content being broadcast, to a serverto request an identity of the content. The server will perform acomputational identification of the content, return the result to thedevice, and store the result. For all subsequently received contentidentification queries requesting an identity of content being broadcastfrom the same source and in a time during which the content is stillbeing broadcast from the source, the server will send the stored contentidentification in response to the subsequent queries. If a subsequentcontent identification query does not request the identity of contentbeing broadcast from the same source or is not received during the timethat the content is still being broadcast, the server will perform acomputational identification of a content sample.

U.S. Pat. No. 8,190,435 issued to Li-Chun Wang, et al. on May 29, 2012entitled “System and methods for recognizing sound and music signals inhigh noise and distortion” that describes a method for recognizing anaudio sample that locates an audio file that most closely matches theaudio sample from a database indexing a large set of originalrecordings. Each indexed audio file is represented in the database indexby a set of landmark-time points and associated fingerprints. Landmarksoccur at reproducible locations within the file, while fingerprintsrepresent features of the signal at or near the landmark-time points. Toperform recognition, landmarks and fingerprints are computed for theunknown sample and used to retrieve matching fingerprints from thedatabase. For each file containing matching fingerprints, the landmarksare compared with landmarks of the sample at which the same fingerprintswere computed. If a large number of corresponding landmarks are linearlyrelated, i.e., if equivalent fingerprints of the sample and retrievedfile have the same time evolution, then the file is identified with thesample. The method can be used for any type of sound or music, and isparticularly effective for audio signals subject to linear and nonlineardistortion such as background noise, compression artifacts, ortransmission dropouts. The sample can be identified in a timeproportional to the logarithm of the number of entries in the database;given sufficient computational power, recognition can be performed innearly real time as the sound is being sampled.

Various implementations are known in the art, but fail to address all ofthe problems solved by the invention described herein. Variousembodiments of this invention are illustrated in the accompanyingdrawings and will be described in more detail herein below.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

An inventive system and method for automatically identifying mediasegments using audio-augmented, image-cross-comparison is disclosed.

In a preferred embodiment, a media segment identifying system, that mayinclude one or more software modules operable on a digital processor,may automatically and efficiently analyze digital media content streamsin real-time by combining an analysis of both the audio and videocontent to produce a unique identifier that can be compared with data ina media segment database. The media segment database may, for instance,contain characteristic landmark-linked-image-comparisons of previouslyidentified media segments. The characteristiclandmark-linked-image-comparisons may, for instance, be constructed byfirst examining the audio stream to identify pairs of audio landmarks,or fingerprints, temporally separated by what may be termed alandmark-time. Digital images associated with the audio landmarks maythen be image-compared to provide a characteristiclandmark-linked-image-comparison that may be used to identify the mediasegment.

For instance, in one embodiment of the invention, the audio landmarksmay be audio peaks that exceed predetermined thresholds. Adjacent pairsof these may be characterized by the time that separates them, which maybe termed a landmark-time. A pair of images, each occurring in theassociated video stream at the same time as one of the audio peaks, and,therefore, separated in time by the landmark-time, may then be comparedby first reducing them to reduced pixel size images, the correspondingpixels of which may be compared, and a numeric comparison formed basedon that comparison.

In one particular example of the method of the invention, a digitalmultimedia stream may have both a digital image stream and an associatedaudio stream. A segment of the audio stream may then be examined toobtain adjacent audio peaks, each of which may, for instance, be threetimes, or more, as high as the audio level in the preceding 0.25seconds. Two images may then be selected from the associated digitalimage stream, each associated with one of the detected audio peaks.These images may, for instance, then be reduced to 64-pixel, gray scaleimages. Corresponding pixels of each of reduced images may then becompared. The image-comparison may take the following form. If the firsthas a greater value than the second, a “1” may be recorded, else if thefirst is less than or equal to the second, a “0” may be recorded. Inthis way, a 64-bit number, the image-cross-comparison, may beconstructed. Together with the landmark-time, i.e., the time between theadjacent audio peaks, this may constitute thelandmark-linked-image-comparison of the digital, multimedia segment.This landmark-linked-image-comparison may then be used as a uniqueidentifier for that multimedia segment it is associated with.

In a further embodiment of the present invention, a single audio peakmay be used to provide what may be termed a zero landmark-time, i.e., alandmark-time that may be equal to zero. In such an embedment, theimage-cross-comparison may, for instance, be between the image itselfand a transformed version of the image, or between the image and astandard reference image, or some combination thereof.

In yet a further embodiment of the present invention, a region of theimage may be selected for use in the image-cross-comparison. In images,such as, but not limited to, images combining multiple views, multipleregions may be selected and the image-cross-comparison may be madebetween the selected regions.

Therefore, the present invention succeeds in conferring the following,and others not mentioned, desirable and useful benefits and objectives.

It is an object of the present invention to provide a practical methodof identifying video segments in multimedia streams that may be used forpurposes such as, but not limited to, ensuring content was delivered asrequired, or detecting when unauthorized content is being delivered.

It is another object of the present invention to provide a method ofidentifying digital media segments that is computationally efficient andmay, therefore, be implemented using modestly powered digitalprocessors.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 shows a schematic representation of a system for media segmentidentification of one embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 2 shows a schematic representation of a current media segment.

FIG. 3 A shows a schematic representation of a reduced size image of oneembodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 3 B shows a schematic representation of a foveal reduced image ofone embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 4 shows a schematic flow diagram of representative steps of asystem for media segment identification of one embodiment of the presentinvention.

FIG. 5 shows a schematic representation of region selection in an imageof one embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 6 shows as schematic representation of duel region selection in animage of one embodiment of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The preferred embodiments of the present invention will now be describedin more detail with reference to the drawings in which identicalelements in the various figures are, as far as possible, identified withthe same reference numerals. These embodiments are provided by way ofexplanation of the present invention, which is not, however, intended tobe limited thereto. Those of ordinary skill in the art may appreciateupon reading the present specification and viewing the present drawingsthat various modifications and variations may be made thereto withoutdeparting from the spirit of the invention.

FIG. 1 shows a schematic representation of a system for media segmentidentification of one embodiment of the present invention.

As shown in FIG. 1, the system 100 may obtain a digital multimediastream 145 that may, for instance, be a television broadcast, or adigital stream, that may be of one or more events, or programs. Thedigital multimedia stream 145 may, for instance, contain interstitialadvertising in the form of one or more media segments. An end user maybe desirable of identifying that interstitial advertising for a varietyof reasons, such as, but not limited to, to ensure that it was timelybroadcast. or streamed, to substitute it out, to eliminate it, or somecombination thereof.

In a preferred embodiment, the system 100 may include a digitalprocessor 104, and one or more software modules operable on the digitalprocessor 104, such as, but not limited to, an audio peak detector 106and an image grabber 107. The audio peak detector 106 may, for instance,examine a current media segment 146 of the digital multimedia stream 145to automatically identify a first audio peak 135 and a second audio peak136. An audio peak may, for instance, be an audio level maximum that isa predetermined height greater than any audio level that precedes it ina predetermined length of time. The image grabber 107 may thenautomatically obtain images from the current media segment 146corresponding in time to the positions of the audio peaks.

The images grabbed by the image grabber 107 may then be fed to animage-comparison module 108. The image comparison module 108 mayautomatically first reduce the images to more a manageablerepresentation. For instance, the image may first be converted to a grayscale image, then reduced to an 8 by 8, 64-bit image. After reducing theimages, the image comparison module 108 may then perform animage-comparison. In the image-comparison, pixels of the images may becompared with in order to produce a binary string that is characteristicof that image. For instance, pixels values of adjacent pixels may becompared, and if a pixel is equal to, or greater, in value than animmediately adjacent pixel, a “1” may be scored. If, however, the pixelis lower in value than the immediately adjacent pixel, a “0” may bescored. In this way, the image may be reduced to a 64-bit binary string,that may also be a binary number, that may be uniquely representative ofthat particular image.

Comparing each image in a video stream may be too computationallyexpensive for many applications. In a preferred embodiment of thepresent invention, the computational expense may be reduced by onlycomparing the images corresponding to the audio peaks. In an even morepreferred embodiment, this comparison may take the form of animage-cross-comparison. In such an arrangement, the comparison may takethe form of comparing the reduced, gray scale pixels in the first image,to reduced, gray scale pixels in the second image. The comparison may bebetween corresponding pixels, or between pixels displaced one or morepixels from the corresponding ones. In a further embodiment, one of theimages may be mirrored prior to comparing the pixels. In this way, acurrent media segment 146 may be represented by two numbers: thelandmark-time, which may be time length between the audio peaks, and theimage-cross-comparison. Combined, the landmark-time and theimage-cross-comparison, may be termed landmark-linked-image-comparison,and may represent a unique identifier for the current media segment 146.

The current media segment 146 may be defined by the audio peaks, or itmay be a segment defined by one or more image boundaries, such as, butnot limited to, image cuts, fades, or other detectable imagetransitions. The current media segment 146 may, for instance, have beendetermined using techniques such as those used to obtain candidateclips, as described in, for instance, U.S. patent application Ser. No.15/852,389 filed on Dec. 22, 2017 entitled “System for the AugmentedAssessment of Virtual Insertion Opportunities”, the contents of whichare hereby fully incorporated herein by reference.

The search and match module 109 may then use thelandmark-linked-image-comparison to automatically ascertain whether ornot the current media segment 146 matches a previously identified mediasegment. This may, for instance, be accomplished by searching a mediasegment database 105. The media segment database 105 may contain one ormore previously identified media segments 110. These previouslyidentified media segments 110 may each be associated with alandmark-linked-image-comparison 115 that is unique to, orcharacteristic, of them. A landmark-linked-image-comparison 115 may bemade up of items such as, but not limited to, a landmark-time 120, andan image-cross-comparison 125. Each previously identified media segments110 may also be associated with additional data such as, but not limitedto, an identity of a rights holder of that media segment, an action tobe performed when a match to the segment is found, or some combinationthereof.

If the current media segment 146 matches one of the previouslyidentified media segments 110 currently stored in the media segmentdatabase 105, it may be automatically tagged for later appropriateaction. That tag may take a form such as, but not limited to, a databaseaddress, a URL, an email address, an identity of a rights holder, orsome combination thereof. The appropriate action may be one such as, butnot limited to, automatically sending an automated message to anidentified rights holder to inform them that their media segment airedon a particular channel at a particular time, or it may be toautomatically instruct a media delivery system to switch what media itis delivering.

FIG. 2 shows a schematic representation of a current media 146.

As represented in FIG. 2, a current media segment 146 may include both adigital image stream 150 and a digital audio stream 140. As describedabove, the audio stream 140 may be automatically examined, usingsoftware modules operable on a digital processor, to find pairs of audiopeaks. The first audio peak 135 and the second audio peaks 136 may bothbe where the audio level attains a magnitude that may be a predeterminedheight 155 greater than any audio level in a predetermined length oftime of adjacent audio. The predetermined height may, for instance, be3-times or more as high, and the predetermined length of time may be0.25 seconds. One of ordinary skill in the art will, however, appreciatethat such values may depend on the nature of the content, and may bevaried without detracting from the inventive concept. The lower limit ofthe predetermined height may, for instance, be in a range from 1.5 timesto 5 times. Similarly, the predetermined length of time may be as littleas 0.1 second to as long as 1 second, or even 2 or 3 seconds.

The length of time between the audio peaks may be designated as thelandmark-time 120, and may represent one of the identifyingcharacteristics of the current media segment 146. As discussed below,one embodiment of the invention may employ the concept of a zerolandmark-time in which an image associated with an audio peak may becompared to a modified version of itself, such as, but not limited to, amirrored version of itself, or to a standard reference image, or somecombination thereof.

As shown in FIG. 2, there may be images in the digital image stream 150that may correspond in time to the audio peaks in the audio stream 140.For instance, a first image 160, may be associated with, i.e., occur atthe same point in time during the broadcast, or streaming, as a firstaudio peak 135. Similarly, a second image 162, may be associated with asecond audio peak 136. These images associated with the audio peaks maybe the images automatically grabbed, and used, by software modulesoperable on the digital processor, for cross-comparison. Thecross-comparison may then provide the image-cross-comparison that may beused in the characteristic landmark-linked-image-comparisons that may beused to identify media segments.

FIG. 3 A shows a schematic representation of a reduced size image of oneembodiment of the present invention.

The reduced size image 165 may be automatically obtained from anoriginal, high resolution color image by first reducing the image from acolor scale to a gray scale, and then reducing the number of pixels inthe image by averaging values within predetermined areas.

In digitized RGB color images, each pixel is typically represented asthree, 8-bit bytes, while in digital gray scale images, each pixel istypically represented by a single 8-bit byte. Operating on images thathave been converted from RGB color images to gray scale images may,therefore, reduce the subsequent computational requirements by a factorof 3.

High definition television images typically have image sizes of either1920×1080 pixels, or 1280×720 pixels, i.e. about 1-2 million pixels.Meaningfully useful images may be produced by reducing the total numberof pixels down to around 50-100 pixels. This may result in a possiblereduction of subsequent computation requirements by a factor of about100,000.

The terms a reduced size image, or a reduced image, is used within thisapplication to refer to an image in which the number of pixels has beenreduced. For instance, the original image may be a 1280 by 1080-pixelimage, having a total of 1,382,400-pixels. The reduced size image maythen be an 8 by 8-pixel image having a total of 64 pixels.

The reduced size image 165 displayed in FIG. 3A is intended to shown animage having equally sized, gray scale pixels 170. For convenience, thereduced size image 165 in FIG. 3A is shown to be a 4-by-4-pixel image.More typically, the images are only reduced to 8-by-8-pixel images.These equally sized pixels may, for instance, be obtained by averagingthe values of pixels from the original image that fall within the areaof a pixel of the reduced size image.

When performing image-comparison during image-cross-comparison, eithercorresponding pixels may be compared, or displaced pixels may becompared. The degree of displacement may be arbitrary, though typicallya displacement by either one pixel horizontally or vertically may bepreferable. The displacement may ensure that two very similar images donot produce a null cross comparison, i.e., one in which most, or all,the values are “1”, representing nearly identical images.

Alternately, one of the reduced images may be mirrored prior toimage-comparison, i.e., the (1,1) pixel may be compared to what was the(N, 1) pixel, the (2, 1) to the (N−1, 1) etc., where N is the totalnumber of pixels in a row of pixels. This may ensure that two verysimilar images do not produce a null cross comparison, i.e., one inwhich most, or all, the values are “1”, representing nearly identicalimages.

FIG. 3 B shows a schematic representation of a foveal reduced image ofone embodiment of the present invention.

In the foveal reduced image 175, each of the pixels 170 in the reducedimage may not be of equal size. Instead there may, for instance, be apixel core 176, surrounded by one or more rings 177 of slightly largerpixels. In this way, more accuracy may be obtained with video sequencesin which a significant amount of the changes in the image areconcentrated towards the center of the image, as in, for instance,talking head presentations as occur frequently in news relatedbroadcasts.

In one embodiment, the foveal reduced image 175 may have an N by N pixelcore 176 surrounded by M rings 177 of 2N(N+1) pixels, wherein N and Mare positive integers. In a particular example, each of said first andsecond reduced size images may be a foveal reduced image having a2-pixel by 2-pixel core surrounded by 3 rings of 12 pixels.

Image-comparison of the foveal reduced images to produce animage-cross-comparison may, for instance, be accomplished by comparingcorresponding reduced images, or it may be done by comparingcorresponding pixels after mirroring one of the reduced images. Themirroring of one of the reduced images may ensure that two very similarimages do not produce a null cross comparison, i.e., one in which most,or all, the values are “1”, representing nearly identical images.

FIG. 4 shows a schematic flow diagram of representative steps of asystem for media segment identification of one embodiment of the presentinvention.

In Step 401, “RECEIVE UNIDENTIFIED MEDIA SEGMENT”, a current,unidentified media segment may be obtained from a digital multimediastream that may have both a digital image stream and an associateddigital audio stream.

In Step 402 “IDENTIFY AUDIO LANDMARKS AND LANDMARK-TIME”, the audioportion of the current media segment may be examined to obtain two ormore audio peaks. An audio peak may, for instance, be a location in timeof an audio maximum that is a predetermined height greater than anyaudio level of the audio track in a preceding, predetermined length oftime. It may also have to exceed an audio level of the subsequent audiolevel in the digital audio stream for a second, predetermined length oftime. In one, specific example, the predetermined height may be at least3 times, or more, as high, and said predetermined time may be for atleast 0.25 seconds.

The landmark-time may be the temporal difference between the occurrenceof the two audio peaks.

In Step 403 “IDENTIFY LANDMARK ASSOCIATED IMAGES”, images in the digitalimage stream that correspond in time to the audio landmarks identifiedin the associated digital audio stream may be captured for imageprocessing.

In Step 404 “REDUCE IMAGES”, the landmark associated images obtained inStep 403 may be reduced to simply further image processing. Thissimplification may allow the use of significantly less powerful imageprocessing computers, or digital processes.

Image reduction may include both reducing the images from color imagesto gray scale images, and reducing the number of pixels in the image.These processes may be done in either order.

Color to gray scale image reduction may, for instance, reduces thesubsequent computational requirements by a factor of 3. This may resultbecause, in digitized RGB color images, each pixel is typicallyrepresented as three 8-bit bytes, while in digital gray scale images,each pixel is typically represented by a single 8-bit byte.

Reduction by reducing the number of pixels used to represent the imagemay result in a reduction of subsequent computation requirements by afactor of 100,000. This is because high definition television imagestypically have image sizes of either 1920×1080 pixels, or 1280×720pixels, i.e. about 1-2 million pixels. Meaningfully useful images can beproduced by reducing the total number of pixels down to around 100.

In one preferred procedure, both the first and second reduced sizeimages may an N-pixel by M-pixel image in which all the image pixel areof equal size, N and M being positive integers. One arrangement may befor both first and second reduced size image to be an eight-pixel byeight-pixel, equal pixel size, reduced image.

An alternate image reduction procedure may be to reduce the images tofoveal reduced images. In such reduced images, the pixel sizes are notall equal. Instead, pixels near the center of the reduced image aresmaller, having been averaged from a smaller number of pixels in theoriginal image. Such reduced images be more representative of smallchanges in the vicinity of the center of the original image.

A foveal reduced image may, for instance, have an N by N pixel core,surrounded by M rings of 2N(N+1) pixels, wherein N and M are positiveintegers. In one specific, example, the two reduced size images may befoveal reduced image having a 2-pixel by 2-pixel core surrounded by 3rings of 12 pixels.

Instep 406 “IMAGE-COMPARE TO PRODUCE IMAGE-CROSS-COMPARISON”, tworeduced images obtained by the methods outlined in the proceeding stepsmay then be image-compared to produce an image-cross-comparison.

Corresponding pixels of each of reduced images may then be compared. Forinstance, if a pixel from the first reduced image has a value that isgreater value than a corresponding pixel from the second reduced image,a “1” may be recorded. However, if the pixel from the first, reducedimage has a value that is less than or equal to the corresponding pixelfrom the second image, a “0” may be recorded. In this way, a binarystring, that may also be interpreted as a binary number may be producedthat may be the image-cross-comparison.

Alternately, one of the reduced images may first be mirrored, i.e.,either the rows, or the columns swapped so that the 1^(st) becomes thenth, and the 2^(nd) becomes the n−1 th, etc., and the comparison madebetween corresponding pixels in the first, reduced image and in thesecond, now mirrored, reduced image. In this way, if the original imagesare very similar, there is less chance of obtaining a nullimage-cross-comparison in which all, or most, or the elements of thecross comparison binary string are “1”s.

Such comparisons may be done both if the reduced image is an equal sizedpixel reduction, or a foveal image reduction.

If the reduced image is an equal sized pixel reduction, the comparisonmay also be made between displaced pixels, i.e., pixel (x, y) may becompared to pixel (x+1, y) or to pixel (x, y+1). In this way, if theoriginal images are very similar, there is less chance of obtaining anull image-cross-comparison in which all, or most, or the elements ofthe cross comparison binary string are “1”s. The amount of thedisplacement may be any integer, and may warp around so, for example,the last row of pixels may be compared with the other images first rowof pixels.

In Step 407 “COMPARE TO MEDIA SEGMENT DATABASE” a media segment databasemay be examined to determine if the current media segment matches anypreviously identified media segments. These previous media segments may,for instance, be known entities such as, but not limited to,interstitial commercials. An end user may wish to identify such entitiesfor purpose such as, but not limited to, determining that a particularmedia segment was aired, or streamed, on a particular channel or mediastream on a particular day or time. Or the end user may wish to avoidsuch entities by, for instance, switching channels when particular mediasegments are being encountered.

The media segment database may contain one or more previously identifiedmedia segments that may be identifiable by theirlandmark-linked-image-comparison, or characteristiclandmark-linked-image-comparisons. These may simply be a combination ofa landmark-time and an image-cross-comparison.

By comparing the landmark-time and the image-cross-comparison of thecurrent media segment, found using the methods outlined in the previoussteps, with those of the previously identified media segments containedin the media segment database, it may be determined if the currentsegment matches a previously known segment.

Depending on the application, the match may need to be identical, or itmay be sufficient if the matches are with in predetermined ranges.

The matching may proceed by either comparing by first comparing theimage-cross-comparisons, and if a sufficiently closeimage-cross-comparison match is found, then comparing thelandmark-times. Or the matching may proceed by first comparing thelandmark-times, and if a sufficiently close landmark-times match isfound, then comparing the image-cross-comparisons.

If, for instance, the image-cross-comparison is represented as an N-bitbinary string, a sufficiently good match may, for instance, be one inwhich the strings differ by 3, or fewer, of the binary string bits. Orit may be one in which 2%, or fewer, of the bits are different, or itmay be one in which 10%, or fewer, of the bits are different.

Similarly, landmark-times may be deemed sufficient close for a match ifthey are within a predetermined percentage of each other, such as, butnot limited to, within 5% of each other.

Once a media segment has been matched, it may be tagged appropriately sothat suitable information may also be associated with it. The additionalinformation may be information such as, but not limited to, an identityof a rights holder, an identity of a channel on which the segment wasbroadcast or streamed, a date and time of such streaming, or somecombination thereof. The tag may take a suitable form such as, but notlimited to, a URL of an information source, a database address, acontact email address, a contact telephone number, or some combinationthereof.

If a match is not found, the method may proceed to Step 409 “DATABASEUPDATE?”. The system may, for instance, be being used to identifycandidate sequences for some task such as finding new interstitialsequences. If this is so, the method may then proceed to Step 411“UPDATE DATABASE” in which the database is now updated with a candidate,which may be useful if further sequences match it. If not, the methodmay proceed to Step 410 “GET NEXT MEDIA SEGMENT” and then loop back toStep 401.

If, however, in Step 408, a match is found, the method may then proceedto Step 410 “IDENTIFY MEDIA STREAM”. This may, for instance, involveaccessing additional data that may be stored in the media segmentdatabase such as, but not limited to, identification of the owners, orrights holders, of the previously identified media segments that hasbeen deemed to be a match.

In Step 413 “TAKE ACTION APPROPRIATE TO IDENTITY”, the method may nowtake an action such as, but not limited to, sending an automated messageto an identified rights holder to inform them that their media segmentaired on a particular channel at a particular time, or it may be toinstruct a media delivery system to switch what media it is delivering.

After performing the appropriate action, the method may then loop backto Step 401 to continue monitoring the digital multimedia stream,looking at appropriate current media segments.

In further embodiments of the invention, the audio peaks may be definedin a variety of ways such as, but not limited to, the two highest audiomaxima that occur within a video segment, the two highest audio maximathat occur that occur with a certain time of an event within, or thatdefines a start or end, of a video segment.

One of ordinary skill in the art will also appreciate that the videosegments may be pre-found using techniques such as those used to obtaincandidate clips as described in, for instance, U.S. patent applicationSer. No. 15/852,389 filed on Dec. 22, 2017 entitled “System for theAugmented Assessment of Virtual Insertion Opportunities”, the contentsof which are hereby fully incorporated herein by reference.

One of ordinary skill in the art will also appreciate that the inventivemethods described above may also be adapted to use audio minimums ratherthan maximums, or a combination thereof.

FIG. 5 shows a schematic representation of region selection in an imageof one embodiment of the present invention.

In a further embodiment of the invention, the landmark time may beeffectively reduced to zero, and the system may operate with respect toimages identified by single audio peaks, that may be identified aspreviously described. Such images may, for instance, be describe asbeing associated with a zero landmark-time. The image-cross-comparisonmay proceed as previously described except that the second digital imagemay instead be a standard reference image, or it may be a transformedversion of the image itself.

In yet a further embodiment, the comparison may proceed by firstautomatically selecting a first region 185 of the first image 160associated with the audio peak. This first region may, for instance, besome subset of the image such as, but not limited to, the upper twothirds of the image, a center section leaving out a peripheral boundary,a mid-section, or some combination thereof.

The image-cross-comparison may then be between the selected first regionand some standard reference image of the same pixel dimensions, or itmay be with a transformed version of the region itself. Thistransformation may, for instance, be a transposition about a verticalaxis 205, a horizontal axis, or some other suitable transposition.

As described previously, the regions may first be reduced in size and togray scale versions before comparison, and as before a numerical valueof the comparison may be obtained by a method such as, but not limitedto, automatically comparing the value of each of the pixels of the firstgray scale image to the value of a pixel in the second gray scale imageand recording a 1 if it is greater than or equal, and a 0 if it is less.

FIG. 6 shows as schematic representation of duel region selection in animage of one embodiment of the present invention.

As shown, a first region 185 and a second region 186 may be selectedfrom a first image 160 that may, for instance, be associated with anaudio peak. The image-cross-comparison 125 may then be between theselected regions, or the selected regions may themselves each be crosscompared to a reference image, or to transposed versions of themselves,or some combination thereof.

In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the broadcast mayhave a split screen format and the first region may be selected from aleft half of the digital image and the second region may be selectedfrom a right half of the digital image. As described before, theselected regions may be reduced by reducing the number of pixels and mayalso, or instead, be converted to gray scale images before comparison.

Although this invention has been described with a certain degree ofparticularity, it is to be understood that the present disclosure hasbeen made only by way of illustration and that numerous changes in thedetails of construction and arrangement of parts may be resorted towithout departing from the spirit and the scope of the invention.

The invention claimed is: 1: A method of media segment identification,comprising: providing a digital processor; providing an identified mediasegment database, in functional connection to said digital processor,comprising one or more previously identified media segments, saidpreviously identified media segments having an associatedlandmark-linked-image-comparison, said associatedlandmark-linked-image-comparison comprising a landmark-time and animage-cross-comparison, said image-cross-comparison being animage-comparison between a first digital image associated with an audiopeak and a second digital image; obtaining, by said digital processor, acurrent digital multimedia stream, having a current media segmentcomprising a digital image stream, and a digital audio stream;automatically generating, by one or more software modules operable onsaid digital processor, a landmark-linked-image-comparison for saidcurrent media segment; automatically comparing, by said software module,said obtained landmark-linked-image-comparison with saidlandmark-linked-image-comparisons in said media stream database; and ifsaid obtained landmark-linked-image-comparison matches one of saidlandmark-linked-image-comparisons in said identified media segmentdatabase, automatically tagging said current media segment as beingequivalent to the identified media segment having said matchedlandmark-linked-image-comparison. 2: The method of claim 1, wherein, anaudio peak is an audio maximum that is a predetermined height greaterthan any audio level in said digital audio stream in a preceding,predetermined length of time. 3: The method of claim 2, wherein, saidpredetermined height is 3-times or more as high, and said predeterminedtime is 0.25 seconds. 4: The method of claim 2, wherein, saidimage-cross-comparison comprises: automatically selecting a first regionof said first digital image; automatically converting said selectedfirst region to a first gray scale image; and automatically comparingthe value of each of the pixels of said first gray scale image to thevalue of a pixel in a second gray scale image and recording a 1 if it isgreater than or equal, and a 0 if it is less. 5: The method of claim 4wherein said second gray scale image is said first gray scale imagetransposed about a vertical axis. 6: The method of claim 4, wherein, thepixels in said first gray scale image are compared to correspondingpixels in said second gray scale image. 7: The method of claim 4,wherein the pixels in said first gray scale image are compared todisplaced pixels in said second gray scale image. 8: The method of claim7, wherein the pixels in said first gray scale image are compared topixels in said second gray scale image displaced by one row. 9: Themethod of claim 4, wherein said first region is selected from a lefthalf of said first digital image and said second gray scale image is asecond region selected from a right half of said first digital image andconverted to form said second gray scale image.